Given what we're able to measure, comparing countries to one another...
- Property rights, as a both legal and cultural institution, seems to be the #1 factor influencing growth.
- Rule of Law (low discretionary power to government agents)...really this means that the rules aren't going to change ex-post facto.
- Cultural factors are important...no one knows which ones.
- Government corruption is huge in inhibiting growth
- Low marginal tax rates are positively correlated with growth.
- Limited democracy tends to win as the highest-growth governance option, whether that be through the half-democracy Asian model, or the technocracy of Scandanavia. Direct democracy is also good. Kleptocracy and large democracy suck.
- Regulations almost universally inhibit growth, but sometimes benefit other things enough to compensate.
- Freer trade is better than more protectionism, ceteris paribus
- Practical knowledge increase ~= growth.
- Real competition between jurisdictions increases growth.
- Property rights + Predictable Rule of Law
- Less government action is better in 90+% of cases.
- Better government action is better in some cases too.
- Culture matters lots, but in unknown ways.
1 comment:
To a small extent corruption can compensate for excessive regulation or government discretion.
This is part of why China can function.
But overall I can't disagree.
Post a Comment