The virtue of excellence

Friday, April 8, 2011

Law and Chaos

The core dilemma in policy seems to come down to two apparently conflicting, but blatantly true ideas.
  1. All (+/- 3%) new stuff (things, ideas, plans, etc.) is crap.
  2. Those new things that aren't crap are responsible for ALL the differences between our lives and those of the dirt-eating peasantry of Egypt c. 2000BC.
The two of these together would only suck moderately, except for #3, which some people don't understand yet:
  1. You can't tell which new stuff won't suck beforehand.
And that is the challenge we face as humans, the reason why Hayek was the most important thinker of the 20th century, and the primary misunderstanding facing the world today. Most folks actively disbelieve #3.

Almost all new stuff sucks, but some new stuff is tremendously valuable. And we can't tell the difference up front. Makes for an...interesting life.

It's fairly obvious

2 comments:

AMcGuinn said...

Yes, I'd say that's true.

The result is that the tradeoff, between creating more new stuff (97% of which will be crap) and selecting more effectively from the crap we're already dealing with, is made under conditions in which intuition can be very misleading.

You can benefit for a long time by picking carefully through the crap, but eventually you'll run out. That could produce some very long-wave cycles.

drpat said...

It's worse than that. Because of the ~3% that isn't crap. 99% IS crap on the first try.

So that leaves 0.03% that isn't crap on the first try. And a very valuable 2.97% that was crap on the first try, but if you keep at it will turn out to be antibiotics or something.

Now try separating that category from the stuff that is crap, but actually works on the first try, but doesn't lead anywhere. (Raiding the next village for food. Hey, this works! Let's base our society on it.)