Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search This Blog
Pic
Contact
Currently Reading
Friends + Family
BlogFriends
Thinking Better
Econblogs
Pro-liberty
Political Engineering
Evolutionary realism
Health
Followers
Blog Archive
-
►
2013
(71)
- ► April 2013 (18)
- ► March 2013 (17)
- ► February 2013 (12)
- ► January 2013 (16)
-
►
2012
(390)
- ► December 2012 (26)
- ► November 2012 (28)
- ► October 2012 (39)
- ► September 2012 (19)
- ► August 2012 (8)
- ► April 2012 (51)
- ► March 2012 (48)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (71)
-
►
2010
(976)
- ► December 2010 (22)
- ► November 2010 (54)
- ► October 2010 (9)
- ► September 2010 (57)
- ► August 2010 (138)
- ► April 2010 (73)
- ► March 2010 (119)
- ► February 2010 (105)
- ► January 2010 (105)
-
►
2009
(376)
- ► December 2009 (66)
- ► November 2009 (85)
- ► October 2009 (56)
- ► September 2009 (73)
- ► August 2009 (49)
- ► April 2009 (5)
- ► February 2009 (1)
There was an error in this gadget
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
2 comments:
Long, but I felt that he was just stating his opinion, without providing facts to prove his case.
Doesn't mean he was wrong, though.
Dr. Pat,
I don't think it's PROVEN...
but we have reason to believe it.
1. Recipes to be followed are the source of wealth (Romer's future Nobel).
2. Recipes generate wealth when (a) someone builds the recipe, and (b) someone follows the recipe.
3. Software is replacing 2b with robots/software.
4. The source of all wealth, is converging then upon recipes, and software to follow the recipe.
5. Therefore...the ability to make the computer follow the resume is the uber-skill.
6. 10x is real, and understated. It's really infinite, because shitty programmers are negative value.
7. If the most(*) valuable skill is programming, and programmers vary massively in value...
8. One can easily take his position seriously.
Post a Comment